You adore the Eurovision Song Contest and you say this totally without the kind of qualifiers that Brits usually add at this point. Such as ‘it’s so tragiclly kitsch’.
In fact, you are rather bemused by the fact that the British persist in regarding the thing as a monumental joke and yet follow programmes like Pop Idol with depressing sincerity. On both shows the musicianship these days is pretty good, but whereas the Eurovision entries are varied, interesting and sometimes quite original, the other shows are wall to wall bland.
The UK spectacular missing of the point is usually neatly encapsulated in their total inability to send a decent song along.
This year, we fielded the sort of entry we fondly imagine the Eurovision is full of. Except, of course, ours was better because we were doing it ironically. So we had people in flight attendant uniforms making suggestive remarks about champagne bottles, doing aeroplane impressions and singing about how they wanted to fly the flag over all the countries in Europe.
Fly the flag over all the countries in Europe? The flag? The flag?
Really, you were quite disappointed anyone voted for us at all after that rampant display of unrepentant imperialism.
The French entry, on the other hand, was funny. Since the French, year after year, have traditionally rather humourlessly sent women stubbornly singing ballads in French even when everybody had succumbed to doing it all in English, the fact that they did it in Franglais showed a proper entry into the spirit of things. And they wore pink PVC, were jolly, and it was a much better song all round.
But to really get the full beauty of it you had to be quite good at both English and French. You don’t think many people are that good at English or French. The default language of the tournament may be English, but the trick is to try and string together the English words which are universally recognised (’love love love love love love love love’) in some kind of logical order rather than anything more sophisticated.
So nobody voted for it either. Except you.
Actually you are quite pleased that the rise of digital TV systems which allow translations and such seems to have encouraged people to start singing in their own language again.
The whole point, for you, of Eurovision is to enjoy a small lifting of the fog cutting the continent off from the UK, and this does not include having to pay attention to the words, which really don’t deserve it, particularly when they are written in someone’s second language. You positively enjoy listening to the other languages in fact.
This year you had your own awards for ‘ most random English lyric’ . Russia won hands down for some really ill-conceived ‘ummy’ rhymes and calling each other bitches. You are so proud. The UK came a close second though, which is really quite embarrassing when you think about it.
Anyway. You generally refuse to vote for anyone singing totally in English, although you streatched a point for Georgia this year because, although the song was a blatant rip off of Madonna’s Ray of Light, you did feel that the ethnic dancers pulled one back for national flag waving. Plus, the singer was, as a singer, rather better than Madonna, and you happen to like that song.
B was forced to vote for Romania, on the grounds that they were the only people singing in Russian.
But there’s a bit of good humoured patriotism and then there’s the Ukraine.
Who sent along a well known TV personality of the Dame Edna Everage type to do a bit of techno bopping.
Terry Wogan described it as incomprehensible, mainly because the entirety of the lyrics submitted for the Eurovision’s subtitlers to play with were pretty much ‘I want to see… Lasha Tumbai.’ Although the silver costumes complete with a hat with a large five pointed star and energetic dancing might have had something to do with that too.
You have visions of the BBC’s researchers running around and trying to find out who Lasha is in Ukrainian popular culture and why she’s a suitable person to sing about at Eurovision.
They should have ignored the spelling and had a go at imagining what it might mean if you are singing in English with a strong Ukrainian peasant accent and you don’t want to tip your hand too blatantly.
It’s supposed to stand for ‘I want to see… Russia goodbye.’
Which you find incredibly insulting not primarily to Russia, but to the competition, which sees itself as one of these goodwill hands across the border type affairs. And you also find mean spirited the the fact that they presumably deliberately set out to trick Europe into singing along.
So you were hugely relieved when Serbia won with a perfectly pleasant, well executed song sung in Serbian about love.


Spot on, Solnushka. I only made it to Song 13 last night, so missed Serbia, but I LOVED the French entry and would have voted for it had I stayed awake. What was happening with the Irish song though? My husband’s theory is that Ireland can’t afford/don’t want to host Eurovision again so they deliberately entered a crap song. What say you?
Hello -I also thought the French entry was a refreshing change (for them)and Wogan’s comments regarding the French entry were a bit uncalled for. I Enjoyed last night a lot.Lots of spectacle. I quite liked the Georgian entry myself and despite any perceived voting alliances the Serbian entry was a powerful song with a powerful visual element. A good time was had by all. Roll on next year.
Well, as for the percieved voting alliances, the reason why certain countries all vote for one another isn’t entirely blind.
It’s bacause a) all the Slavic languages are somewhat mutually comprehensible, so they all get each others songs and/ or the language sounds comfortably familiar b) because they’ve all heard each others songs before the contest on the radio c) half the singers/ groups are familiar faces – one of the Former states singers was the winner of the Pop Idol style show in Russia and the Ukranian guy is (used to be now?) on Russian TV too for example d) on the odd occassion they do something ethnic that’s recongnisable and comfortable mutually familiar too and e) they take it more seriously.
And when Russia, say, fields a particularly bad song they come fifteenth. A lot of those who have won in previous years were languishing around the bottom this year, regardless of any favouritism. I was wondering whether the Russians were doing well this time because of the political subtext though.
Mind you, I suppose it does underline how cut off we are from the rest of Europe.
The Irish Irish song as a way of deliberately chucking the competition, Charlotte? Dangerous game to play that – I think they won once with something very full of fiddles and Irish brogue, didn’t they? It’s probably more the fact that the singer only half hit the first few notes that did for it this time though.
Incidently, were the Fins out to prove that they do, in fact, out metal and goth the rest of Europe or did they just feel a need to keep up with the theme their winners set?
Not that I’m complaining, mind. I thought their staging was fab.
I didn’t realise that the Irish lady was singing in English until we remembered to turn the subtitles on. I did strike me that if it had been X-Pop Factor Joseph Idol or whatever, and Simon Cowell had told her that she’d sung flat, the whole audience would have booed him. The studio audience of those shows always boos negative comments,even if blindingly obvious. Which is annoying. And I’m ranting now. In your comments. Which is rude. Sorry.
The Georgian entry? Was that the one where the cossack dancers (which probably isn’t what they’re actually called, but that’s what us Brits are more likely to call them) managed to look mildly camp, particularly when the swords came out? That was…odd.
Romania was fun, singing in multiple languages and poking fun at stereotypes. France’s lyrics were indeed entertaining, though I didn’t like the ‘Madness wearing pink’ performance style, and Russia’s words made me want to hide somewhere far, far away. The pet theory in the room was that it was written by someone who has English as their first language and is particularly cruel. If the Ukraine thing is true, then shame on them.
I didn’t like the Serbian entry. I hope it’s not because it wasn’t in a language I speak (I can get by following lyrics in French and Spanish). But my musical tastes are unusual, and clearly not in line with Eurovision voters. I will only watch it with a group of others, preferably with a number of different languages spoken by the people in the room in order to get more out of the proceedings. Particularly if the translation thingy is on (”that’s not what she’s singing about at all!” is a frequent cry).
The Ukranian singer says it is ‘churned butter/ whipped cream’ in Mongolian. Which it isn’t. It’s a joke in appallingly bad taste if you ask me. And a _splendid_ publicity stunt.
Twat.
The theory that to be that bad it must have been done on purpose about the Russian entry has merit. Although I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it were some third rate lyrisit who can’t get a job back home trying his arm abroad either.
The first rate one, after all, wrote the UK entry and the second the Irish one so…
I don’t think it’s a case of liking or not liking it on purpose because the language is unknown, it’s just that familiar things are so comfortable, generally.
Georgia odd. Odd? Odd!!?? Don’t you know swirly quasi Greek/ Turkish whirly dancing if you see it? I dunno, you just think that part of the world only has belly dancers, don’t you… *grins*
Well, their costuming was more reminiscent of cossack type stuff, as were the swords, although I do know full well that this would be more typical of an area far further North than Georgia. I hadn’t made the quasi-Greek/Turkish connection. Dervishes! Slightly camp dervishes!
The win by Serbia was reported on Australian TV but, for some inexplicable reason, after filming happy crowds in Belgrade, the report skipped to some miserable people in Kosovo saying that Serbia didn’t deserve to win.
I found a link to the dervishes: http://www.easternartists.com/DANCE%204%20Caucasus.html I don’t think they’d like being called camp. It’s supposed to be _heroic posing_.
*Sigh* Obviously Eurovision and I both have the same misconception about the whole friendly nature of the competition.
We should probably just give in and declare it as all out war.
I don’t normally find dervishes camp, just these ones, honest.
Well, it is Eurovision after all.
I was thinking about the language thing, and I think the point I was trying to make is that the words can’t be what you are relying on to make the song work. I mean, if the whole point of the song is the witty lyrics then that’s going to be lost on half the audience.
Partly bacause of the language barrier and partly because I have a sneaking suspicion that most people are like me and don’t pay much attention to lyrics the first 25 times they hear a song.
But because a lot of the Eatern bloc people have heard each others songs, or song very like them, 25 times before…
And (and am I spending too much time thinking about this or what?) it’s got to be classic pop in the sense that it’s got to have a hook which grabs on and doesn’t let go so that your song stands out over all the other 15 which everyone has just been forced to listen to.
Something memorably odd about the band helps too.
To be honest, I don’t like the sort of music that wins either. Russia sent one of my favourite bands along once – a group called the Mumin Trolls. They’re a guitar band. They bombed. They were neither memorable enough, catchy enough, pretty enough nor weird enough to make much of an impression in three minutes.
About the only thing they had going is that the singers voice is very… distinctive, and that sounded dredful in English for some reason.
Mind you that breaks my ‘it’s familiar so people will vote for it’ rule. Probably best if I stop trying to neatly compartmentalise everything right now…
Games…
ConspiracyResearch. org Community Blog……